Last Sunday George Osborne explained in a TV interview how the Tories plan to fund the reductions in corporation tax they have promised.
During the Andrew Marr show Mr Osborne initially stated that the reductions in the rate of corporation tax would be paid for by the “abolition of some complex reliefs”. When pressed however, he went a little further and stated that "an investment relief predominantly available to small businesses would be abolished" to “simplify tax".
The only obvious candidate for such abolition would be the 100% Annual Investment Allowance (AIA). However this relief currently simplifies the tax position for small businesses as it enables them to write off the cost of capital assets acquired each year (upto £50k pa). Crucially the relief is also available to sole traders and to partnerships who would not benefit from the reduction in corporation tax. So abolishing the AIA completely would mean more tax and complexity for them and no compensatory reduction in the rate of tax payable on their profits.
At this stage we can but hope that, if the Tories are elected, that the AIA remains available to the smallest businesses (regardless of their legal structure). The tax system has long been distorted due to the damage caused by constant tweaks to the tax status of small businesses. Reductions in the rate of tax paid by small companies on their profits will perpetuate the destablising impact of constant tax changes for smaller businesses.
Does this now mean what we all suspected for some time, that the Tories are no fans of assisting small businesses? Is this Labour hitting the next generation for a tax bill we can't afford? Are the tories repeating the same mistakes and concentrating on the city?
ReplyDeleteWhy not limit government borrowing in line with what government actually spends!? (see twitter #juryteam2010 for a bit more common sense!)